Programs & Initiatives
Technology-neutral strategies to deliver Nebraska-level rates and grid resilience.
Grid Modernization
Upgrade aging infrastructure with smart grid technology to improve reliability, reduce outages, and enable efficient energy delivery across Maine's rural terrain.
Customer Assistance
Expanded support for low-income households, seniors, and vulnerable customers. Public power prioritizes affordability for everyone, not shareholder dividends.
Phased Grid Acquisition
A Low-Risk, Step-by-Step Path to Maine-Owned Power
The Maine Sovereign Power Authority (MSPA) will acquire the state's transmission and distribution infrastructure through a carefully phased approach that minimizes risk, avoids service disruptions, and proves value to ratepayers before any statewide commitment.
Unlike the all-at-once model proposed in the 2023 Pine Tree Power referendum—which opponents successfully portrayed as a risky, immediate 'hostile takeover'—MSPA's phased strategy starts small, demonstrates success locally, and expands only when clear benefits are confirmed.
Three-Phase Implementation Strategy
Why Phased Acquisition Works
Proves Value First
Ratepayers see tangible benefits (lower bills, fewer outages) in pilot communities before the entire state commits.
Reduces Financial Risk
Initial costs are limited to pilot-scale debt (hundreds of millions, not billions), funded by tax-exempt revenue bonds.
Minimizes Disruption
Service continuity is legally guaranteed; no statewide blackout or chaos is possible.
Builds Public Support
Success in real Maine communities (e.g., rural Somerset County) counters fear-mongering and demonstrates that customer-owned power can deliver what foreign-owned utilities have not: affordable, reliable electricity owned by Mainers.
This deliberate, evidence-based rollout draws from successful public-power expansions (e.g., Nebraska's gradual district-by-district growth in the 1930s–1940s and Long Island Power Authority's phased transition in the 1990s). By starting small and scaling only with proven results, MSPA ensures Maine gains control of its grid responsibly—protecting ratepayers, workers, and communities every step of the way.
Competitive Procurement Under MSPA
Technology-Neutral, Subsidy-Free Bidding for Lowest-Cost Reliable Energy
The Maine Sovereign Power Authority (MSPA) will procure electricity supply through a fully competitive, all-source, technology-neutral process that eliminates subsidies, mandates, carve-outs, or preferential treatment for any generation type. This approach ensures MSPA acquires the lowest all-in cost energy that meets reliability needs, allowing hydro, natural gas, biomass, wind, solar, and other resources to compete equally on price, performance, and system value—no favoritism, no hidden supports.
This model draws from proven practices in public power systems and regulated utilities that use open, competitive solicitations to discover the best market prices. For example, Nebraska's public power districts (like Nebraska Public Power District) and other entities conduct periodic competitive procurements or long-term contracting to secure reliable, low-cost power without mandates. Maine's existing standard-offer service (SOS) procurement already uses competitive RFPs for default supply, providing a familiar framework MSPA can build upon and improve.
Core Principles of MSPA's Procurement Process
No Subsidies or Mandates
All state-level technology-specific incentives (e.g., remnants of net energy billing credits, RPS carve-outs for renewables, or tax breaks tied to solar/wind) are repealed for new procurements upon MSPA's enabling legislation. Legacy contracts expire per their original terms with no extensions or renewals. MSPA cannot offer or accept preferential compensation, credits, or exemptions based on generation technology.
Technology-Neutral Competition
Every resource—dispatchable (hydro, natural gas, biomass), intermittent (wind, solar), hybrid (e.g., solar + storage if proposed), or emerging (e.g., small modular reactors if viable)—competes on equal terms. Bids are evaluated solely on their ability to deliver reliable energy at the lowest total cost to ratepayers.
Focus on Price + Reliability
The overriding goal is the lowest effective cost per reliable delivered kilowatt-hour, accounting for full system impacts (energy, capacity, flexibility, transmission integration, backup needs, and environmental compliance costs).
Open and Transparent
All bids are publicly solicited, independently evaluated, and subject to Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC) oversight and approval.
Step-by-Step How Competitive Procurement Works
Determine Procurement Need
MSPA, in coordination with the PUC, conducts periodic integrated resource planning (every 3–5 years) to identify future capacity, energy, and reliability requirements. This includes forecasting load growth, retirements of uneconomic assets, winter peak demands, and system flexibility needs. The need is defined in a technology-neutral way (e.g., 'X MW of firm capacity and Y GWh of annual energy with Z ramping capability')—no quotas for specific technologies.
Issue All-Source Request for Proposals (RFP)
MSPA releases a comprehensive RFP open to new builds, existing resources (upgrades or life extensions), long-term contracts (10–20+ years), and different ownership models (independent power producers, self-build options if MSPA proposes them, joint ventures). Bidders submit detailed proposals, including pricing (fixed or indexed), performance guarantees (availability, dispatchability, ramp rates), location and transmission impacts, integration costs (e.g., backup for intermittent resources), and contract terms and risk allocation.
Independent Evaluation and Modeling
An independent evaluator (selected by the PUC or a bipartisan panel) reviews bids for completeness, eligibility, and initial competitiveness. Qualifying bids advance to detailed modeling using advanced production cost and capacity expansion tools (e.g., PLEXOS, SERVM, or similar). All bids are modeled together in the same system simulation to compare portfolios for lowest-cost combinations that meet reliability standards (e.g., planning reserve margin, loss-of-load expectation <0.1 days/year). Sensitivity analyses for fuel prices, weather extremes, carbon costs (if applicable), and transmission upgrades ensure intermittent resources like wind or solar are only selected if they deliver net value after accounting for firming needs (e.g., gas backup or storage costs).
Bid Selection and PUC Approval
The lowest-cost, reliable portfolio is recommended. The board selects winners, and the PUC reviews/approves the final contracts for justness and reasonableness. Winners sign power purchase agreements (PPAs) or ownership transfers (if MSPA builds). Unsuccessful bidders receive feedback to improve future participation.
Ongoing Monitoring and Adjustments
Contracts include performance penalties/incentives. MSPA monitors delivery and can re-procure if needs change (e.g., due to load growth or retirements).
Procurement Process Flowchart
Determine Procurement Need
MSPA, in coordination with the PUC, conducts periodic integrated resource planning (every 3–5 years) to identify future ...
Issue All-Source Request for Proposals (RFP)
MSPA releases a comprehensive RFP open to new builds, existing resources (upgrades or life extensions), long-term contra...
Independent Evaluation and Modeling
An independent evaluator (selected by the PUC or a bipartisan panel) reviews bids for completeness, eligibility, and ini...
Bid Selection and PUC Approval
The lowest-cost, reliable portfolio is recommended. The board selects winners, and the PUC reviews/approves the final co...
Ongoing Monitoring and Adjustments
Contracts include performance penalties/incentives. MSPA monitors delivery and can re-procure if needs change (e.g., due...
Determine Procurement Need
MSPA, in coordination with the PUC, conducts periodic integrated resource planning (every 3–5 years) to identify future capacity, energy, and reliabil...
Issue All-Source Request for Proposals (RFP)
MSPA releases a comprehensive RFP open to new builds, existing resources (upgrades or life extensions), long-term contracts (10–20+ years), and differ...
Independent Evaluation and Modeling
An independent evaluator (selected by the PUC or a bipartisan panel) reviews bids for completeness, eligibility, and initial competitiveness. Qualifyi...
Bid Selection and PUC Approval
The lowest-cost, reliable portfolio is recommended. The board selects winners, and the PUC reviews/approves the final contracts for justness and reaso...
Ongoing Monitoring and Adjustments
Contracts include performance penalties/incentives. MSPA monitors delivery and can re-procure if needs change (e.g., due to load growth or retirements...
Result: Lowest-Cost, Reliable Power Portfolio
Competitive bidding discovers true market prices and ensures Maine ratepayers get the best value for reliable electricity
Real-World Precedents Supporting This Approach
Nebraska Public Power Districts: While much of Nebraska's power comes from owned hydro, coal, wind, and nuclear, districts issue competitive RFPs for incremental needs or long-term supply. This keeps costs low (11–13 ¢/kWh residential) by leveraging market discovery without mandates.
Other All-Source Examples: Utilities like Xcel Colorado (2017 solicitation) received hundreds of bids across wind, solar, storage, and gas—resulting in 'shockingly low' prices (e.g., median wind bids ~$18/MWh, solar ~$30/MWh) through fair competition. Similar processes in New Mexico, Indiana, and El Paso Electric have driven cost savings and diverse portfolios without forcing specific technologies.
Maine's Existing Standard-Offer Process: The PUC already runs competitive RFPs for default supply (e.g., 2025–2026 solicitations for CMP and Versant customers), with bids evaluated on price. MSPA expands this to full-system needs while removing any legacy biases.
Benefits for Maine Ratepayers
Lowest Possible Costs: Competition reveals true market prices—no subsidies inflate bids or hide costs.
Reliability First: Dispatchable resources (hydro, gas) naturally win for baseload/winter peaks; intermittent sources only enter if they reduce overall system costs.
No Landscape or Subsidy Burdens: Large wind/solar projects must win on merit and gain local approval—no ratepayer-funded preferences.
Transparency and Accountability: PUC oversight, independent evaluators, and public bid modeling prevent favoritism.
By procuring through open, subsidy-free bidding, MSPA ensures Maine gets the most affordable, reliable power available—whether from hydro dams, efficient gas plants, local biomass, or any other source that proves cheapest when all costs are fairly compared. This levels the playing field and directly addresses concerns about past programs that favored certain technologies at ratepayers' expense.
Workforce Protection
Guaranteeing Jobs, Wages, Benefits, and Union Rights for Current Utility Employees
The Maine Sovereign Power Authority (MSPA) places the highest priority on protecting the men and women who keep Maine's lights on every day. All current employees of Central Maine Power (CMP), Versant Power, and any related service providers performing transmission and distribution work will be offered continued employment with MSPA under terms that preserve or improve their current compensation, benefits, and working conditions. MSPA's enabling legislation will include ironclad, enforceable workforce protections to eliminate fear of job loss, wage reduction, pension disruption, or erosion of collective bargaining rights during and after the transition.
These commitments are modeled on successful public-power transitions (such as Long Island Power Authority's 1998 acquisition from LILCO and several municipal utility conversions) where employee protections were statutory requirements and resulted in high retention, maintained morale, and no net job losses. MSPA goes further by explicitly preserving private-sector union status and strike rights—avoiding any reclassification as public employees that could limit bargaining leverage.
Key Workforce Protection Provisions
No Layoffs from Transition
MSPA will not implement layoffs solely as a result of the ownership change. Any workforce adjustments will be driven by operational needs (e.g., increased vegetation management or grid hardening crews) and handled through attrition, voluntary buyouts, or reassignment.
MSPA will maintain or increase total staffing levels in the first five years to support reliability improvements and rural service priorities.
Enforcement and Accountability
All protections will be codified in MSPA's enabling statute and included in the acquisition agreements with CMP and Versant.
The Maine PUC will monitor compliance during the transition, with authority to impose penalties or corrective action if violations occur.
Employees or unions may seek enforcement through the NLRB, Maine Labor Relations Board, or state courts.
Annual public workforce reports will detail retention rates, wage trends, safety incidents, and training investments.
Commitment to Maine's Workforce
By embedding these protections into law and practice, MSPA ensures that the skilled workforce that has kept Maine powered through storms and winters remains intact, motivated, and fairly compensated. The transition to customer-owned power will strengthen—not weaken—the careers of the people who do the work every day. This approach has proven successful in other public-power conversions and directly addresses past concerns that reform would threaten good union jobs in Maine communities.
Grid Resilience Investment Plan
Reinvesting Savings into Storm Hardening, Backup Systems, and Rapid Restoration Capabilities
The Maine Sovereign Power Authority (MSPA) will generate significant annual savings through the elimination of shareholder profits (historically exceeding $187 million combined from CMP and Versant), tax-exempt status (saving approximately $16 million yearly in corporate income taxes), and efficiency gains from consolidated operations and subsidy repeals. These funds—conservatively estimated at $100–200 million per year once fully operational—will be reinvested directly into enhancing Maine's grid resilience.
Maine's forested, rural terrain makes the grid particularly vulnerable: The state experiences some of the nation's highest outage durations, with weather-related disruptions costing millions annually (e.g., CMP spent $24.5 million on 2024 storm cleanup alone). By contrast, Nebraska's public power districts demonstrate how customer-owned models reinvest surpluses into resilience: NPPD maintains top-quartile reliability in a similarly rural, storm-prone state through proactive upgrades, achieving outage reductions of 30–50% in targeted areas while keeping rates at 11–13 ¢/kWh.
MSPA will allocate 40–60% of annual savings (initially $40–120 million/year) to these efforts, guided by an independent annual resilience audit and PUC-approved multi-year plans.
Storm Hardening: Building a Tougher Grid
Storm hardening involves physical upgrades to infrastructure to withstand extreme conditions, reducing the risk of failures from ice loading, high winds, flooding, and falling trees.
Stronger Poles and Structures
Replace aging wooden poles (many 50–70 years old in Maine) with resilient materials like steel, fiberglass, or composite poles designed for higher wind/ice loads (up to 100+ mph gusts and 1–2 inches of ice).
MSPA will scale this statewide, targeting 500–1,000 miles of lines annually at $1–2 million per mile.
Nebraska precedent: NPPD and Southwest Public Power District used FEMA grants to replace poles and conductors, yielding a 115% return on investment by avoiding $1.33 million in losses from a 2007 ice storm.
Covered and Upgraded Wires
Install tree-resistant covered conductors (e.g., spacer cable systems) to prevent short-circuits from branches or debris. Upsize wire diameters for better wind resistance.
Initial focus: High-outage corridors in forested rural areas, where tree-related failures cause 70–80% of outages. Projected cost: $500,000–$1 million per mile, with 200–300 miles upgraded yearly.
Reduces outage frequency by 40–60%, per PUC studies.
Vegetation Management Enhancements
Double current budgets ($10–20 million/year) for aggressive trimming and danger tree removal (trees outside rights-of-way but at risk of falling). Use AI satellite imagery, LiDAR drones, and predictive analytics to target high-risk areas proactively.
In Maine, this could avoid $20–50 million in annual storm recovery costs.
Nebraska example: Omaha Public Power District increased tree-trimming budgets by 56% post-2024 storms (from $15.7 million to $24.5 million), preventing thousands of outages.
Elevated and Flood-Resistant Substations
Raise critical equipment (transformers, controls) in flood-prone areas (e.g., coastal and riverine zones) and install flood barriers.
Cost: $5–10 million per substation upgrade, starting with 10–15 high-risk sites in the first five years.
These investments will be phased: Pilots in rural areas demonstrate effectiveness before statewide rollout, ensuring measurable reductions in SAIDI (outage duration) from current highs (e.g., 200–300 minutes/year in some areas) to under 60 minutes.
Backup Systems: Ensuring Redundancy and Continuity
To bridge gaps during outages, MSPA will deploy distributed backup systems that provide power to critical loads (hospitals, emergency services, farms, and homes in remote areas) when the main grid fails.
Microgrids and Localized Generation
Develop community-scale microgrids (e.g., 1–5 MW) with hybrid setups: Efficient natural gas generators, hydro mini-plants (leveraging Maine's 730 MW hydro baseline), and battery storage for firming.
MSPA target: 20–30 microgrids in five years, costing $10–20 million each, funded by savings and federal IIJA/BRIC grants.
Nebraska precedent: NPPD's microgrid pilots in rural districts use on-site storage and dual-fuel capabilities to maintain service during blizzards, reducing downtime by 50–70%.
Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)
Install grid-scale batteries (10–50 MWh) at substations for peak shaving and outage bridging (2–4 hours of backup).
Cost: $200–400/kWh installed, with 100–200 MWh deployed initially.
Stabilizes voltage during storms and integrates any competitive intermittent resources without mandates.
Redundant Transmission Lines
Build parallel or looped lines in vulnerable corridors to create failover paths. MSPA will pursue SPP NTC projects, offsetting 30–50% of costs through regional recovery.
These systems will prioritize equity: Low-income/rural areas get first access to subsidized home batteries or microgrid tie-ins.
Rapid Restoration Capabilities: Faster Recovery Post-Storm
MSPA will enhance response speed through technology, workforce, and partnerships, aiming to restore 90% of customers within 24 hours of major events (vs. current multi-day delays).
Advanced Monitoring and Automation
Deploy smart-grid sensors, AMI meters, and AI predictive analytics for real-time fault detection and auto-isolation. Drones and satellite imagery for post-storm damage assessment.
Cost: $50–100 million over five years for statewide rollout.
Nebraska example: NPPD's distribution automation radios and reclosers cut restoration times by 30–40%.
Expanded In-State Crews and Mutual Aid
Hire 200–400 additional full-time workers for storm response, plus dedicated prepositioning teams. Strengthen mutual-aid pacts with neighboring public power entities.
Nebraska's OPPD prepositioned crews during 2024 derecho events, restoring 219,000 outages faster than IOUs in similar storms.
Training and Equipment Upgrades
Annual simulations, upgraded vehicles (e.g., all-terrain for rural access), and mobile command centers. Invest $10–15 million/year in tools like hydraulic pole setters and covered-wire installers.
Projected Investments, Funding, and Outcomes
Annual Allocation: $40–120 million from MSPA savings, plus federal grants (e.g., $15.6 million like Nebraska's 2025 resiliency awards) and PUC-approved rate components for major projects.
Total 5-Year Investment: $500–800 million, yielding 30–50% outage reductions (per FEMA studies showing 115% ROI on similar hardening).
Long-Term Savings: Avoid $20–50 million/year in storm recovery (Maine's 2024 storms cost CMP $24.5 million); lower insurance premiums; economic benefits (e.g., reduced lost wages from outages in rural areas).
Independent audits will track progress, ensuring every dollar delivers measurable reliability gains.
Transforming Maine's Grid
By reinvesting locally rather than sending profits abroad, MSPA transforms Maine's grid into a resilient, 21st-century system—keeping power flowing during emergencies and protecting communities from the growing threats of extreme weather.
Governance of the Maine Sovereign Power Authority (MSPA)
Democratic Oversight, Transparency, and Accountability to Maine Ratepayers
The governance structure of the Maine Sovereign Power Authority (MSPA) is designed to ensure that the utility remains accountable to Maine ratepayers, operates transparently, prioritizes affordability and reliability, and avoids the pitfalls of politicization, foreign influence, or shareholder-driven decisions that characterize the current investor-owned model. Drawing from successful public power precedents—such as Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD), where an 11-member popularly elected board oversees operations across a rural, statewide system—MSPA combines democratic election with expert appointment to balance customer voice and professional expertise.
MSPA is established as a nonprofit public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Maine, independent of day-to-day state executive control but subject to robust regulatory oversight. This structure mirrors best practices in public power utilities nationwide, where governance emphasizes local accountability, transparency, and fiduciary duty to customers rather than profits.
Board of Directors: Composition and Selection
MSPA is governed by an 11-member Board of Directors, structured to provide both direct ratepayer representation and specialized knowledge:
5 Ratepayer-Elected Members
These members are chosen directly by Maine voters in statewide elections, divided into five geographic districts aligned with current Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC) divisions or Senate districts to ensure broad rural and urban representation (e.g., one district covering Somerset County and western Maine, including Anson).
Elections occur every six years on a staggered schedule (similar to NPPD's six-year terms for its 11 elected directors, who represent 84 of Nebraska's 93 counties).
Campaigns are funded through Maine's Clean Elections program, which provides public financing to qualifying candidates, minimizing private money influence and ensuring accessibility for everyday Mainers.
Candidates must demonstrate relevant experience (e.g., utility operations, finance, engineering, rural economics, or consumer advocacy) and cannot be active politicians, current utility executives, or lobbyists for five years before or after service.
6 Appointed Expert Members
These members bring technical and professional expertise to complement the elected directors.
Nominated by a bipartisan panel (Governor, Senate President, House Speaker) and confirmed by a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to ensure cross-party support and independence.
Required areas of expertise include utility finance, electrical engineering, rural economic development, labor relations, consumer/low-income advocacy, and procurement law.
Strict conflict-of-interest rules prohibit service by current or former politicians (within five years), utility insiders, or lobbyists.
The hybrid model (majority expert-appointed with strong elected component) addresses concerns from the 2023 Pine Tree Power debate, where critics feared an overly politicized or inexperienced board. It exceeds purely elected models (like NPPD's all-elected board) by incorporating safeguards for expertise while preserving democratic control.
Leadership and Decision-Making
Board Officers: Elected annually by the board from among its members (e.g., Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary), similar to NPPD's process where directors like Wayne Williams serve as Chair.
Voting and Quorum: Decisions require a majority vote; major rate increases or policy changes need a supermajority (e.g., 7 of 11 votes) and public justification.
Statutory Fiduciary Duty: The board's primary legal obligation is to minimize the effective cost per reliable delivered kilowatt-hour for Maine ratepayers while maintaining high reliability standards. This duty is enforceable through PUC review and judicial action.
Oversight and Regulatory Framework
MSPA operates under full regulatory supervision to prevent abuse and ensure public interest alignment:
Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC): Retains comprehensive authority over rates, safety, service quality, and reliability—identical to its current oversight of CMP and Versant. All rate plans, major capital investments, and procurement contracts require PUC approval. The PUC can impose penalties or corrective orders for non-compliance.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC): Continues jurisdiction over interstate transmission matters.
Freedom of Access Act: All board meetings are open to the public, with recordings archived online; records and decisions are publicly accessible.
Independent Audits: Annual financial and operational audits by a national firm (e.g., Big Four accounting) and a utility consultant, with results published publicly.
Accountability Mechanisms
Public Dashboards and Reporting: Quarterly online reports detail rates vs. national benchmarks, outage statistics, procurement savings, workforce metrics, and resilience investments.
Advisory Councils: Six permanent councils (unions/IBEW, rural municipalities, small businesses, large commercial/industrial customers, low-income advocates, environmental organizations) provide mandatory input on major decisions, though without veto power.
Recall and Referendum: In any district, 10% of registered voters can petition for a special recall election of their elected director. Major policy changes (e.g., large acquisitions) can be subject to statewide referendum if petitioned.
Legislative Review: Automatic five-year reviews by the Legislature, with pause or reversal authority if performance metrics (e.g., bill reductions, reliability targets) are not met for two consecutive years.
Comparison to Precedents
Nebraska Public Power District: An 11-member popularly elected board (six-year terms) governs statewide operations, with decisions by majority vote. This has delivered stable low rates (11–13 ¢/kWh) and high reliability in a rural state. MSPA adapts this by adding expert appointees for added safeguards.
Other Public Power Models: Many municipal utilities use independent boards (elected or appointed) with PUC-like oversight, ensuring transparency and customer focus. MSPA's structure aligns with American Public Power Association best practices: local control, no shareholder dividends, and fiduciary duty to ratepayers.
PUC Oversight & Regulatory Framework
Maine PUC
Comprehensive Authority
- Rate Approval
- Safety Standards
- Service Quality
- Reliability Metrics
FERC
Federal Oversight
- Interstate Transmission
- Market Rules
- Regional Coordination
Independent Audits
Financial & Operational
- Annual Audits
- Public Reports
- Transparency
Advisory Council Structure
MSPA Board of Directors
11 Members: 5 Elected + 6 Appointed Experts
Labor/IBEW
Worker representation and safety
Rural Municipalities
Small town and county input
Small Business
Commercial customer needs
Industrial Customers
Large commercial interests
Low-Income Advocates
Affordability and access
Environmental Orgs
Sustainability perspectives
Mandatory Consultation
All councils provide input on major decisions. No veto power, but recommendations must be publicly addressed.
Accountability Pathways
Public Transparency
All board meetings public with online archives
Quarterly reports on rates, outages, savings
Direct Voter Control
5 elected directors every 6 years (staggered)
10% petition triggers special election
Regulatory Enforcement
Penalties and corrective orders for violations
Annual financial and operational reviews
Legislative Safeguards
Automatic Legislature review of performance
Authority to halt if metrics not met 2+ years
Multi-Layer Protection
Four independent accountability pathways ensure MSPA remains responsive to Maine ratepayers with no single point of failure. Transparency, voter control, regulatory oversight, and legislative review work together to prevent abuse and guarantee results.
This governance framework ensures MSPA remains truly sovereign—owned and directed by Mainers, for Mainers—while incorporating checks and balances to deliver affordable, reliable power without the foreign profit extraction or opacity of the current system. It directly counters past criticisms of "government takeover" by embedding expertise, transparency, and ratepayer-first accountability from the start.
Join the Movement for Maine's Energy Sovereignty
End foreign control. Cut rates in half. Keep Maine's energy dollars in Maine. Add your voice to the movement for customer-owned electricity.
Take Action Now